Home > Buy Now > Monitoring & Diagnostic Equipment > X-Ray Equipment > DDRInventor-V
 


JSB Medics Co., Ltd.
 
icon R/F Digital Imaging Up-grade System
icon DDRInventor-V
icon Scan-DRC

line

icon Company Profile
icon Index
icon Bulletin Board
icon Guest Book

line



visitors: 469
 
Contact us
JSB Medics Co., Ltd.
[Korea]
Address:
201-901 Buchon Techno-Park, 192, Yakdae-dong, Wonmi-gu, Buchon-si Gyeonggi-do 420-733 Korea
Phone:
82-70-82248700
Contact name:
Herman Jee , Export Manager
Inquire now









JSB Medics Co., Ltd.
 
DDRInventor-V

DDRInventor-V

Inquire now

DDRInventor-V

Click to enlarge image

 Origin Korea
 Model Number DDRInventor-V

Introduction of DDRInventor-V

 

1.       High image quality and Low dose irradiation – Perfect detector

 

Digital radiography system, Scan-DR, adopts MIC(Multi-channel Ionization Chamber) detector which has intrinsic features of high efficiency by direct conversion of incident X-ray to electric signal, high fill factor without dead zone and without dead pixel and adopts scanning system which can prevent scattered radiation with fan beam. These characteristics of MIC detector provide merit of high image quality with low dose irradiation against patient.

 

2.       Convenient & Compatible Software

 

DR-Works, based on DICOM, is completely compatible with HIS(Hospital Information System). The hospitals even without PACS can manage patient information and images independently of its own viewer and database.

 

3.       Economic Operation

 

Scan-DR is an economic solution, since MIC detector has long lifetime due to its non-sensitivity to temperature, humidity, vibration, and treatment. Also, JSB can provide a full-coverage of customer service in short time, since it has its own technology on core parts and keeps sufficient inventory.

 

4.       Advantages of Long Image

 

DDRInventor-V has arbitrary image size of maximum 16”X39” image. And it does not need a long-size cassette for whole spine or long bone. Therefore, it has great efficiency on chiropractic study(1:1 scale of vertical direction).

 

 

 

System Specification

  Item Data
Generator Power Supply 3Φ 380VAC, 50~60Hz
Radiography tube voltage 40~150KVp(1KVp)
Radiography tube current 10~500mA(17step)
Exposure time 1msec~10sec
Radiography mAs 0.1~1000 mAs
Max output 40kW
X-ray tube Focal Spot 0.6mm
Operating Voltage 40~150kV
Target Angle 12°
Heating Unit 1,000,000HU
Detector Detector MIC Detector
Size of Image 16 x 39 inch(Max)
Image Matrix 2048 x 5710(Max)
Pixel size 200 um x 200 um
Spatial resolution 2.5 LP/mm
DQE 50%(at 2.5 LP/mm)
Gray Scale 16384(14bit)
Scan speed 7, 10, 14 cm/sec
Scanning time 2.5~4 sec(for 17")
Image acquisition time < 1sec
Shots per hour 120 images(for 17")
Operation Console OS WIndow 2000/XP
Monitor 17"LCD
Hard Disk 80GB x 2
Storage 8000 Images more
RAM 1 GB more

 

A Comparison to Computed Radiography with Respect to Image Quality and Radiation Dose

 

1.       From January 2003 to March 2007, Samsung Medical Center compared the slot-scan digital radiography(SSDR) of the lower extremity region and the computed radiography(CR) method with respect to the image quality and radiation exposure. To obtain an SSDR image, they used DDRInventor-V.

 

2.       The result was that the SSDR method demonstrated a better image resolution and contrast when compared against the SAPL of the CR method. The overall scores for the SSDR method, for all levels, were significantly higher than those obtained by the CR method. And the entrance skin dose of the SSDR method was less than half of the entrance dose of the SAPL for the CR method at the level of the hip and knee, but was similar at the level of the ankle. Similarly, it is also lower(much lower in some cases) for the comparison of the entrance skin dose for SSDR method compared to the SL and the SAPL and SL combined of the CR method.

 

3.       In conclusion, the data suggest that the SSDR method can provide a better image quality than the CR method in the lower extremity region, as evidenced by a more detailed anatomy in the medullary bone and soft tissue of the lower extremity region. In addition, the SSDR method, for the most part, exposes the patient to a lower entrance skin dose, especially for imaging at the level of the hip and knee.

 

About MIC Detector

1.       Direct conversion

Most of the digital radiography systems which are based on charge-coupled device(CCD) and amorphous silicon(a-Si) are indirect conversion type that uses scintillator to convert incident X-ray into visible light. That is, they need two-step process to get electronic signal for digital image and that image quality is significantly affected by scintillator.

 

On the other hand, MIC detector is direct conversion type. The X-ray irradiation which passed through the patient penetrates into the space between the electrodes. And the gas filled in the chamber is ionized to generate charges on the corresponding electrodes. The induced charges are read directly by electronics.

2.       High Fill Factor and No Dead Pixel


MIC detector has no loss of effective sensing area because most of all ions are captured between the electrodes. Above all, MIC detector has nearly no dead pixel by its intrinsic characteristics.

3.       High Reliability


The MIC detector has strong durability on operating environment such as surrounding temperature (-10
℃~45℃), humidity, vibration and treatment. This feature provides users with benefit on the maintenance for economic operation.

 

Advantages of scanning method

 

1.       No Scattering of Irradiation

 

Scattered X-ray photons can contribute very significantly to the exposure of the image. In screen-film or flat panel type radiography, scattered radiation causes a reduction of contrast of the image. The main effect of scattered radiation is to increase the noise of image. Grids are used to reduce scattered radiation, but can also produce artifacts on the image.

 

In the case of scan type, the fan beam by collimator reduces scattered radiation from patient and linear structure of detector also prevents incident scattered ray from patient. Therefore, there is no need of severe image processing to remove the noise from scattered radiation and image processing speed is very fast.

 

2.       Low Dose

 

Normal exposure time of conventional screen-film radiography for chest is about 0.01~0.05 sec. In the case of Scan-DR, exposure time per line depends on scanning speed and is under 0.005 sec. at normal scan speed. Therefore, effective exposure time of Scan-DR is shorter than that of other radiography systems. In addition, characteristics of MIC detector related to high image quality such as direct conversion, low scattered radiation and high fill factor contribute to low radiation dose on patients.

 

3.       Low Distortion

 

The film-screen and flat plate type detector cannot avoid the image distortion in vertical and horizontal directions. Scan-DR shows real size of image in the vertical direction.

 



icon   Certificates Certificate Name Certificate Number
CE 11512

Inquire now